A Nordic blonde glances repeatedly into her rear-view mirror. She sees
her husband following closely. Suddenly, he accelerates and taps her car
with his. He pulls back, then hits her car again, harder. When he rams
her car a third time, she veers wildly; barely maintaining control of her
vehicle. Is this scene depicting an attempt at murder? No. In David
Cronenberg's "Crash," this is foreplay.
Based on J.G. Ballard's 1973 novel, "Crash" is about a group of people
who are sexually aroused by car wrecks. The highly controversial NC-17
film won a special jury prize at the Cannes Film Festival, for
"originality, daring and audacity." Ted Turner, owner of Fine Line, the
company distributing the film, has been quite vocal about his utter
disgust with the movie. Nationally, General Cinema has refused to run
"Crash" in any of their theaters.
All this fuss is intriguing, of course, and may tempt you to check out
the film. Don't. To put it as succinctly as possible, "Crash" is
pretentious crap. David Cronenberg has been cranking out similar creep
shows for years. He specializes in nightmare visions of sex merged with
technology, heavily spiced with close ups of wounds and surgical
instruments. Occassionally he hits pay dirt. His remake of "The Fly" was
a spellbinding mixture of horror and romance. But more often, as with
"Videodrome" and "Dead Ringers," Cronenberg simply produces trumped-up,
pseudo-intellectual versions of the kind of Grade Z gore-fests that
littered drive-ins back in the ‘60's.
As for the plot, "Crash" barely has one. James Spader loses control of
his car and hits another vehicle head-on, killing the other driver and
leaving the driver's wife (Holly Hunter) seriously injured. While
hospitalized, Spader meets Hunter's "friend" Vaughn (Elias Koteas,) a
grotesquely-scarred performance artist who stages reenactments of famous
celebrity crashes. Spader and wife Deborah Unger (the kind of ice queen
that frequently popped up in Hitchcock films) quickly become members of
Vaughn's car-sex cult. Then everyone in the cast wrecks cars and screws
each other for an hour and a half. The end.
There's a lot of sex in "Crash" and most of it is repellent. The most
disgusting moment (and there are so many to choose from) comes when
Spader hooks up with Rosanna Arquette, a horribly mutilated cult member
bedecked with leg braces and lots of leather, and has sex with her
scarred-over wound.
Vaughn is the erotic center of the group. The cultists dote on his
mangled body and listen intently to his whispered babble. "Crashes mingle
the sexual energy of the dead with the living," Vaughn murmurs, "creating
an intensity that sets the latter apart from, for lack of a better
description, safer drivers." Early on, he tells Spader he's involved in
"the reshaping of the human body by modern technology." Later, he
confesses that his statement was "just a test," to see if Spader was
ready for the *really* heavy stuff. Eventually, everyone in the cast has
sex with Vaughn. After all, who could resist a guy like that?
"Crash" has a slow, deliberately mechanical feel. The emotionally stunted
characters show no despair over the death of one of their own, merely
regretting that they didn't get to watch. They rarely make eye contact
during sex. They rarely even act like people; it's as if they are all
various aspects of one terribly sad personality.
The consensus of opinion is that "Crash" is a cautionary tale, suggesting
that our culture has grown so jaded that we must go to sick extremes to
reach any vague semblance of satisfaction. Supposedly, Cronenberg has
used these offensive images to force the viewer into examining the nature
of sexual obsession, without being distracted by anything genuinely
erotic. I doubt it. David Cronenberg has used these images repeatedly
throughout his career for a reason. I suspect that he gets off on this
stuff, that these images of wounds, surgical instruments and the like
reflect what turns him on. I suspect "Crash" has no message, that
Cronenberg is simply pulling pictures from some dark corner of his soul
and putting them on film because he can. But you don't have to watch him
do it.
Copyright © 1997 Edward Johnson-Ott