Winning wars requires personal qualities that are usually frowned
up in civilian life - ability to take other man's life without remorse,
disregard for personal safety, automaton-like following of orders etc.
In order words, many military heroes aren't the types you would like
in polite company. What goes for war sometimes goes for other forms
of social conflict, including the struggle for civil liberties. Some of the
toughest battles have been won by people who were far from what
people usually associate with decent human beings. One of such
examples is the protagonist of THE PEOPLE VS. LARRY FLYNT,
protagonist of 1996 biopic directed by Milos Forman.
The plot of the film deals with roughly two rather extraordinary
decades in life of Larry Flynt (played by Woody Harrelson), one of
the most controversial public figures in contemporary America. It all
starts in early 1970s Cincinnati where Larry Flynt sees that fewer and
fewer people are frequenting his strip joints. In order to promote this
business he starts "Hustler", a magazine that does very badly until its
first publishing coup - nude photographs of Jackie Onasis. Flynt and
"Hustler" become household names, magazine circulation is
skyrocketing, but the publisher soon creates powerful enemies -
conservative politicians who like to score points by going after
"indecency". For them, Flynt with his outrageous personal behaviour
and magazine that sells raw, unrefined pornography beyond the
most liberal standards of conventional decency, represents a perfect
target. Because of this, Flynt's trusted attorney Alan Isaacman
(played by Edward Norton) is forced to spend years in courtrooms,
defending Flynt from the series of criminal and civil charges. But the
most important battle would happen many years later, after Flynt's
brief flirting with fundamentalist Christianity, assassination attempt
that left him paralysed, drug habit and death of his beloved wife
Althea Leasure (played by Courtney Love). Parody in his magazine
leads to conflict with influential preacher Jerry Falwell (played by
Richard Paul), and this conflict would have its final stage at US
Supreme Court, with the verdict that redefined interpretation of free
speech in America.
Czech immigrant Milos Forman was probably the best possible
choice for director of this film. Having his family murdered by Nazis
and growing up under Communism, he learned to appreciate some
freedoms Americans tend to take for granted. When those freedoms
are threatened, challenged or simply not there, someone like Forman
is going to notice it. In his his 1975 classic ONE FLEW OVER THE
CUCKOO'S NEST he used setting of mental institution to show how
even the most "liberal" societies can oppress the individual. In this
film he goes even further, showing that even the most cherished of all
American freedoms - freedom of speech - can be achieved only at the
cost many Americans still consider too great - by tolerating free
speech in its most virulent, most abhorrent and most offensive forms.
Forman obviously took great interest in this story and as a result, a
lot of effort, passion and talents are invested in this film. The casting
is also great and, interestingly enough, three actors playing major
roles have something in common with the characters they play.
Woody Harrelson, just Larry Flynt, leads anti-establishment crusade
in real life, trying to repeal the ban on marijuana. Courtney Love,
who plays former stripper and celebrity wife, used to be one in real
life. Edward Norton, who plays Flynt's lawyer, studied law before
becoming an actor. Real life and film also mix in the form of various
real life politicians and public personalities in cameo roles, including
Flynt himself playing an unsympathetic judge.
Scriptwriters Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski do a very good
job in compressing two decades of Flynt's turbulent life in more or
less coherent narrative whole. The tone of the film almost effortlessly
goes from comedy in 1970s to drama in 1980s, marking not only the
shift in Flynt's personal fortunes but also the cultural and political
shifts in American society (Reagan's neo-Conservativism, emergence
of Christian fundamentalists as political force, AIDS). However,
screenplay is not flawless - Flynt's numerous stays behind bars aren't
resolved on screen and some of the scenes seem like they were
introduced only to provide some spectacular material for movie
trailers (US Marshalls invading Flynt's luxurious mansion is one of
those). Like in all Hollywood biopics in recent times, some of the
historical facts are used selectively. For example, the script conforms
to Hollywood stereotypes and portrays Christian fundamentalists
and hypocritical right-wing politicians as the only villains in this
story; in reality, 1980s anti-pornographic crusade against Flynt and
people like him was aided by radical feminists and other elements
from the American left. Some of the references in the film are
probably going to mean very little to contemporary audience - few of
them would remember Charles Keating (played by James Cromwell)
and savings & loans scandal associated with him.
Yet, despite those flaws, THE PEOPLE VS. LARRY FLYNT is not
only very entertaining, but also a very important film. Unlike many
Hollywood products in last decade, it reminds viewers of few
important truths - democracy can't exist without tolerance;
censorship is the poison of freedom; tolerance must include even the
most abhorrent people or it can't exist at all. Made in the age when
Hollywood itself began to look less tolerant, more open to "friendly
persuasions" from Washinton politicians and with "questionable"
content (sex, nudity, violence, bad language) being gradually
expelled from mainstream movies, THE PEOPLE VS. LARRY FLYNT
has already earned its place in history books.
Copyright © 2003 Dragan Antulov