Judging from the theatrical trailers and TV ads, "Cats and Dogs" should have
been a good movie. It should have been original, energetic, witty, and, most
of all, a love letter to dog and cat lovers everywhere. But it isn't. A
family movie that is too juvenile to impress adults (you know, the way the
recent "Shrek" did), and far too meanspirited to be heartwarming or sweet,
"Cats and Dogs" is a surprisingly ill-advised misfire that surely won't be
garnering many devoted fans above the age of single digits.
The title says it all--the film is a 90-minute battle between cats and dogs
over world domination. Mr. Tinkles (voiced by Sean Hayes) is a beautiful,
white Persian cat who everyone thinks is cute, but actually is the
no-holds-barred leader of the feline population. When word gets out that he
plans to steal the anti-dog-allergy serum that a human scientist (Jeff
Goldblum) has created, it's up to the scientist's new puppy (voiced by Tobey
Maguire) and his camaraderie of fellow dogs to stop the fiendish Mr. Tinkles.
Directed by Lawrence Guterman, "Cats and Dogs" is not particularly enjoyable,
and it's only intermittent smiles are produced from the adorableness of the
animals, rather than the dim-witted screenplay by John Requa and Glenn
Ficarra. Dull and by-the-numbers, there are no characters (human or pet) that
gain our sympathies or that we grow to like, and the only creativity to be
found is merely hinted by the overall premise of cats against dogs.
There is also an obvious bias over the dogs in the picture, all of which are
presented as the "good guys." The cats, on the other hand, are scheming,
manipulative, and nasty, so the movie doesn't even play fair. How are
audiences able to have fun in deciding who to root for when the cats are so
blatantly characterized as the villains? Aside from Sean Hayes' inspired
voiceover work for Mr. Tinkles, the other animals are giant bores, including
those played by such well-known thesps as Susan Sarandon, Alec Baldwin, and
Tobey Maguire.
The human cast is nearly non-existent, both in terms of screen time and
development. Jeff Goldblum (1998's "Holy Man") must be down on his luck these
days; how else can you explain him taking a wasted role reminiscent of Rick
Moranis' in 1989's "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids," and then not even being any
good? Elizabeth Perkins (2000's "28 Days"), as Goldblum's wife; Alexander
Pollock (1999's "Resurrection"), as their son; and Miriam Margolyes (1999's
"End of Days"), as Mr. Tinkles' annoying maid, are equally slumming it with
parts that anybody could have played just as well, or better.
The frequent attempts at humor in "Cats and Dogs," including yet another riff
on "The Matrix," are strictly amateurish, and aside from the clever first
scene, no attempt even seems to have been made to take advantage of its
ingenious storyline. Ultimately, the only mercy that is given to audiences
unfortunate enough to end up in a theater showing "Cats and Dogs" is that
it's only 90 minutes. Without an ounce of entertainment value, anything more
would have, quite honestly, been torture.
Copyright © 2001 Dustin Putman