Remember when JURASSIC PARK first came out? Most critics panned the movie,
stating that while the dinosaurs were spectacular, the film itself was
flimsy stuff, sorely lacking in plot and characterization. Of course,
they failed to realize that we weren't particularly concerned with plot
or characterization. We just wanted to see a movie overflowing with big-
ass, realistic-looking, living, breathing dinosaurs. JURASSIC PARK
delivered the dinosaurs and we flocked to the theaters, making it the
largest grossing film of all time.
Well, it's four years later and the inevitable sequel, THE LOST WORLD:
JURASSIC PARK, has arrived. So what are we looking for this time? Most of
the people I spoke with said the same thing. More big-ass dinosaurs and
non-stop action. Director Steven Spielberg, no dummy when it comes to
anticipating audience expectations, has crafted a film that gives us
relentless action and scores of incredibly realistic dinosaurs. While the
film suffers from the been-there, done-that syndrome, and has some major
structural problems, as far as sequels go, THE LOST WORLD is one of the
better ones.
Here's the premise. John Hammond (Richard Attenborough) really had two
dinosaur islands. The one we saw in the original, and a second, where the
dinosaurs were actually bred, and now live in uncontrolled ecological
balance. Two groups of humans go to the island. The good ones,
reluctantly led by Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum,) merely want to study
the creatures. The bad ones want to hunt the dinosaurs for a new Jurassic
Park, ready to open in San Diego. In short order, of course, all hell
breaks loose and everyone scrambles madly about, trying to avoid becoming
Dinosaur Chow.
THE LOST WORLD wastes no time getting to the action. Following the
obligatory teaser and ten minutes of squabbling between Goldblum and
Attenborough, the film whips out the lizards in grand fashion. The
dinosaurs look significantly better than in the original; so good, in
fact, that it's easy to imagine that the filmmakers somehow got their
hands on real dinosaurs. Come to think of it, we've been reading news
stories about real-life cloning successes for months now. Steven
Spielberg is an incredibly rich man. Do you suppose that maybe he used
his financial resources to…oh, never mind. I'm getting so cute here that
I'm actually annoying myself. Time to get back to business.
The thrills come fast and furious in THE LOST WORLD. Early in the film
there is a spectacular Tyrannosaurus Rex attack, leading to an extended,
extremely intense scene that leaves Dr. Sarah Harding (Julianne Moore)
dangling over a huge cliff, separated from the rocky surf hundreds of
feet below only by a single pane of glass that splinters further and
further in torturous fashion. The scene is totally gripping and one of
the best set pieces in the film.
As for the acting, Jeff Goldblum, promoted from secondary comic relief
figure in the first film to leading man, handles his role well, leaping
about in heroic fashion while tossing off caustic one-liners (when
Attenborough assures Goldblum that he has learned from his mistakes,
Goldblum spits back "Yeah, now you're making all new mistakes.") Vince
Vaughn, the breakout performer from last years wonderful comedy SWINGERS,
creates a distinct, compelling presence as Nick Van Owen, an
environmental activist working for the good guys. Vanessa Lee Chester has
some nice moments as Kelly, Goldblum's daughter who joins the expedition
as a stowaway. The rest of the cast are generic event-movie archetypes,
chewing scenery until the dinosaurs chew them.
That's one of the problems with THE LOST WORLD. In JURASSIC PARK there
were relatively few characters, allowing the audience a chance to get to
know them and to care about their fates. THE LOST WORLD has so many
people swarming over the island that it's hard to keep track of who's who,
let alone become emotionally involved with them. When one character gets
pulling in half by two dinosaurs, the audience reaction is "Cool!", which
says something very good about the special effects and something very bad
about the screenplay.
The biggest problem with THE LOST WORLD is it's climax. A Tyrannosaurus
Rex gets loose in San Diego and goes on a rampage. Things begin well, as
the T-Rex roams through dark suburban backyards. Things get better as the
monster goes berserk in the city streets, shredding a gas station and
several vehicles. And then, just when you're ready for the big final
confrontation between the raging beast and humankind, everything gets
resolved, way too quickly and in a very anticlimactic way. For an action-
packed film, the climax simply doesn't have enough action.
Regardless of its flaws, THE LOST WORLD fares better than most sequels.
Its fast pace helps to minimize the sense of deja vu, and the dinosaurs
are absolutely superb. I was frustrated with JURASSIC PARK for not
showing any pterodactyls. In one of THE LOST WORLD's best shots, several
of the flying reptiles soar through the sky. One lands close to the
camera and slowly stretches out until its wings are fully extended, with
sunlight glinting through the membranes. At that moment I realized that
for hard core dinosaur-watchers, THE LOST WORLD is as good as it gets.
Copyright © 1997 Edward Johnson-Ott