"Shrek" looks at first like a typical fairy tale--actually a
collage of the genre featuring the three blind mice, three little
pigs, Goldilocks' bears, Red Riding Hood's big bad wolf,
Pinocchio and Cinderella. Not long into the movie--which
features some impressive state-of-the-art cgi animation giving
a startling, lifelike appearance to both characters and
landscapes--we see that Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio's
screenplay from William Steig's book subverts one of the
principal conventions favored by the brothers Grimm in their
collection, "Kinder und Hausmarchen."
The brothers shared Sir Arthur Gilbert's grim view of
unattractive women. In their sexist formulation, a homely
woman could never find love and marriage together with a
trip to the castle in a horse and carriage. That beauty is skin
deep seemed a foreign concept to these master story tellers.
Directors Andrew Adamson and Victoria Jenson set out to
make a more politically correct tale. "Shrek" conveys a motif
that should put its young and impressionable audience
straight: one is beautiful if he or she is of wonderful
character. Heart and soul are more precious than derma and
cuticles. We may be at first attracted to others by the
symmetry of features, but for the honeymoon to last, we
must appreciate one another's inner qualities.
The theme should be obvious to the most attention-
challenged seven-year-old. Adamson and Jenson hammer in
the strain without subtlety. But since the journey is more
important than the destination and leitmotifs travel best if
conveyed by entertaining carriers, how well do they succeed
in putting on a show?
The answer is mixed. Like "Chicken Run" (also
distributed by DreamWorks), "Shrek" is wicked, clever and
funny, conveying the feeling that this movie has been made
by human beings and not by machines. But something about
Peter Lord and Nick Park's year 2000 creation hit home in a
more trenchant way. I suppose the opening scene,
comparing the chicken coop to a Hitlerian concentration camp
with poultry faced with certain death, gave that animated
work its bite. "Chicken Run" is penetrating. Despite its motif,
"Shrek" is by contrast still a fairy tale removed from human
drama, its characters, despite their sabotage of Grimm
philosophy of beauty, always remote creations of another
world.
That said, "Shrek" has quite a bit going for it, particularly
the perpetually amusing and sometimes even hilarious lines
for the Donkey, provided with crackerjack delivery by Eddie
Murphy. The Donkey, a Sancho Panza to Shrek's Don
Quixote, is not a stubborn creature at all. In fact he's a
friendly beast with expressive eyebrows and a Cairn terrier's
desire to please. Because he is a lonely animal, he
immediately bonds with Shrek, an outwardly ugly green ogre
who knows enough about the world to realize that he has
little chance to bond with any of the world's fairy tale
creations.
With a delightful Scottish accent provided by Mike Myers,
this fluffy and horn-eared beast has none of the confidence of
Austin Powers, though his inventiveness is intriguing. When
he needs light for his hermit's cave, he simply plunges a long
finger into his ear and extracts sufficient wax to produce a
candle for his grotto. And he has impressive strength. When
the height-challenged Lord Farquar (John Lithgrow) sends an
army of knights to rid his feifdom of what all consider a
disagreeable demon, Shrek dispatches the with the energy of
Ang Lee's Yu Shu Lien. When Farquar sees that Shrek can
gain for him the hand of an imprisoned princess (Cameron
Diaz), with whom a marriage would realize the lord's ambition
to become the king, he dispatches the ogre to the palace to
free the lovely woman with a twenty-first century urban
sensibility. No one suspects that the princess has a secret
fear of sunset that makes her more vulnerable than
Cinderella at midnight.
"Shrek" is fun but a film which despite its subversive theme
will not necessarily snatch the enthusiasm of the young, who
are too well accustomed to the fabulist types portrayed in
imposing computer generated graphics. Nor is there much
here that could gratify the adults who are taken in hand by
their tots and who have the right to expect more grown-up
double entendres than the exclamation by the Donkey that
Farquar's lavish castle must be compensating for his tiny
(word blocked out). Given the team of actors engaged
successfully in the surprisingly difficult job of doing
voiceovers, "Shrek" would have been better with a more
vigorous script. As it stands, it falls short of its tagline, "The
greatest fairy tale never told."
Copyright © 2001 Harvey Karten