Review by Dragan Antulov
1 star out of 4
Those who happen to admire both good books and good films
probably know that the good literature almost always leads
to bad films, while the truly great films often have
inspiration in less than stellar books. This rule should be
applied to movies and television, at least if we draw our
conclusion on the way Hollywood tried to make television
shows out of great movies and vice versa. One of the good
illustration of this phenomena is BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER,
immensely popular television show that it had its first
incarnation as 1992 film directed by Fran Rubel Kuzui.
The heroine of the film is Buffy (played by Kristy Swanson),
high school student from Los Angeles whose life revolves
around cheerleading, shopping, gossiping and all other
activities you could expect from South Californian airhead
bimbo. But the destiny has chosen another path for Buffy,
since she happens to be the Slayer, next in the long
generation of women dedicated to rid the world of vampires.
At least this is the explanation given by Merrick (played by
Donald Sutherland), mysterious stranger who wants to teach
her the skills of vampire slaying. Buffy is sceptical at
first, but when she meets the vampire for the first time,
she grudgingly accepts her fate and starts changing her
life. Her airhead friends can't fail noticing changes in her
behaviour, including her relationship with young car
mechanic Pike (played by Luke Perry), but this surprise is
nothing compared with Lothos (played by Rutger Hauer),
vampire leader whose followers are going to attack
partygoers at the school dance.
Joss Whedon based his screenplay for BUFFY THE VAMPIRE
SLAYER on a very simple concept - nubile blonde that used to
be knife fodder in any serious horror film fights back. This
concept can be effective, and Whedon proved it in his TV
show, but this wasn't the case in the feature film. Main
reason for that lies in the bad direction by Fran Rubel
Kuzui and even worse editing, which left many scenes
unfinished and many interesting characters and situations
unexplored. Humour in the film is of a very low quality and
it would provide few laughs for the audience. The casting is
very impressive, with many future big names in small roles
(Ben Affleck, David Arquette, Hilary Swank), although the
acting happens to be mostly disappointing (especially in the
case of Rutger Hauer, who plays one of the least impressive
villains in the history of cinema). Kristy Swanson in the
lead role does a good job, but the most effective is Donald
Sutherland as her mentor. Unfortunately, their efforts can't
save this film from turning into barely watchable mess, and
after seeing 1992 feature film many viewers would probably
find the new appreciation of the TV show.
Copyright © 2002 Dragan Antulov
|