Review by Dragan Antulov
3 stars out of 4
Despite making a lot of disappointing films in last few
decades, Sidney Lumet is still viewed as one of the greatest
American filmmakers. His past filmography is more than
impressive, with excellent films that tackled various
subjects and featured many talents. Yet, one theme seems to
be common to most of Lumet's films - individuals being
forced to make hard and unpleasant moral choices in modern
urban jungle. These dilemmas, which provide excellent
material for powerful dramas, often become very real to the
people in the law enforcement, and it is understandable why
Lumet tackled with the subject of New York police corruption
in four of his films, starting with SERPICO in 1973. Eight
years later he again explored the same territory in his
drama PRINCE OF THE CITY.
Same as SERPICO, this film is also based on the real events,
covered in the book by Richard Daley. Protagonist of the
film is Danny Ciello (played by Treat Williams), New York
police detective that leads extremely successful five-man
unit specialised in drug busts. Ciello's men work completely
unsupervised and owe much of their success to rather
questionable practices - illegal wiretaps, stealing drugs in
order to pay their junkie informers and, finally, taking
some of the drug money as the extra income. After a while,
people around Ciello and his colleagues, as well as federal
authorities, start becoming aware that meagre police
salaries can't explain their luxurious lifestyles. Ciello
develops conscience and decides to redeem himself by
co-operating with federal prosecutors as an undercover agent
in anti- corruption sting operation. The only condition is
the promise that he wouldn't have to testify against his
partners from the unit. However, as the investigation
progresses and Ciello collects enough evidence to put
multitudes of corrupt policemen and crooked attorneys to
jail, his life, as well as the life of his family, is
increasingly in danger. But the greatest danger comes from
federal prosecutors who discover plenty of criminal misdeeds
in seemingly spotless biography of young policeman. Ciello
is now under danger of being prosecuted and testifying
against his friends from the unit is the only way to save
himself.
PRINCE OF THE CITY, despite earning its share of awards in
1981, is one of the more obscure titles in Lumet's
biography. This is probably due to the public perception of
this film as nothing more than milking on the success of
SERPICO. Similarities between those two films are, however,
only superficial - both are based on true stories and deal
with corruption in New York Police Department. But the
stories are different, the characters are different, and,
naturally the films are different, allowing Lumet to show
his talent in making this film remarkable to anyone patient
enough to sit through almost three hours of its length.
The major difference between SERPICO and PRINCE OF THE CITY
is in the character. While SERPICO features title character
that can be viewed as nothing else than hero engaged in
quixotic struggle against corrupt establishment, Danny
Ciello is complex, multi- layered character whose alignment
and true motives remain mystery to the end and remain open
to various interpretation. Yet, Treat Williams, who plays
Ciello, is an excellent (and tragically underrated) actor
who manages to give arguments to those interpretation with
his powerful performances in each of Ciello's incarnations,
whether he is arrogant cocky policeman, loving husband and
father, loyal friend or pathetic valium-addicted weakling
who would do anything to save his skin. Lumet, who co-wrote
screenplay with Jay Presson Allen, chronicles those
transformations in couple of simple but powerful scenes that
vividly display moral ambiguities of modern-day law
enforcement. One of the examples is the scene in which
Ciello has to find quick fix to his junkie informer;
Williams simply shines in this scene, leaving the audience
with unanswered question - is he acts out of genuine
compassion for his junkie informers or more mundane concern
for them as his only source of information.
The character of Ciello is faced with similar dilemma when
he must appraise federal prosecutors and their motives. In
the beginning they all make generous promises, and Ciello
can allow himself a luxury of seeing them as their friends,
which some of them, like those played by Norman Parker and
Paul Roebling, are. But in the end Ciello becomes nothing
more than expendable tool and friendship from the initial
investigation is replaced by the hordes of faceless
government bureaucrats. Some of those bureaucrats, like
those played by Bob Balaban and James Tolkan, can afford
luxury to view Ciello from their ivory towers and express
general disgust with his corruption, as well as his
blue-collar background. This class dimension of the
conflict, probably as relevant now as it was twenty years
ago, is another reason why PRINCE OF THE CITY should be
viewed as better film than SERPICO, which ignored class
differences for the sake of generational conflict
fashionable in 1960s and early 1970s, but hardly relevant
now. What is even better in this film is Lumet allowing
audience to make their own conclusions about Ciello in the
final scene when prosecutors offer their opposite but
convincing arguments whether to prosecute him or not.
Such powerful drama would be impossible without great cast.
PRINCE OF THE CITY features a whole variety of different
acting talents, each of them shining in small, but effective
roles. Unfortunately, most of those actors are relatively
unknown and most of them failed to find role that would
match their performance in this film. The only reason why
this powerful film has a such an obscure reputation and why
it represents another great example of a film that "they
don't produce any more" might be found in its length and
Lumet's loss of pace in the middle of film. But this small
flaw shouldn't discourage anyone from watching this hidden
1980s gem.
Copyright © 2002 Dragan Antulov
|