Review by Dragan Antulov
3 stars out of 4
For many people in the world (and USA, at least before the
last year's unpleasantness) the outcome of 2000 US
presidential elections was nothing short of coup d'etat.
Various historians and conspiracy theorists may find some
other examples of American government being based on
something different from the will of American people, but
USA was so far fortunate to be spared from the events
usually described by the phrase "coup d'etat" - bunch of
people in uniforms bringing down legitimate government and
taking the power into their own hands. However, it doesn't
mean that it can't happen, and SEVEN DAYS IN MAY, 1964
political thriller directed by John Frankenheimer, dealt
with that disturbing possibility.
Plot of the film, based on the best-selling novel by
Fletcher Knebel and Charles W. Bailey II, is set during the
Cold War. President Jordan Lyman (played by Fredric March)
has signed the nuclear disarmament treaty with USSR only to
helplessly watch his noble deed turning into political
disaster at home - defence industry in shambles, high
unemployment and multitudes of congressmen and senators
screaming bloody murder under pressure of their
constituencies. General James Mattoon Scott (played by Burt
Lancaster), charismatic and popular head of Joint Chiefs of
Staff, on the other hand, is passionately opposed to the
treaty, viewing it as an ultimate betrayal of national
security. While the debate intensifies and Lyman's poll
numbers continue to drop, Scott and the rest of military
establishment are preparing for seemingly routine
manoeuvres, but Scott's aide Marine Colonel James "Jiggs"
Casey (played by Kirk Douglas) finds many strange details
about that particular exercise. After a while, Casey comes
to the disturbing conclusion about Scott preparing military
take- over of the government. He informs the President about
his doubts, but Lyman decides not to act against potential
conspirators before gathering enough evidence. Instead he
sends his most trusted associates to investigate, but they
have only few days before the exercise.
SEVEN DAYS IN MAY is the perfect embodiment of the phrase
"they don't make them anymore". Made four decades ago, this
political thriller is in many ways different from the
contemporary examples of the genre. It doesn't feature a
single shootout or car chase, and it completely relies on
drama as the only source of excitement. Instead of having
single hero that would single-handedly destroy vast and
seemingly all-powerful conspiracy, this film uses more
realistic scenario with many different people who are
sometimes as rootless as the conspiracy. Finally, both sides
in the conflict are portrayed as patriots deeply convinced
that their cause is just, thus creating unpleasant dilemmas
for the characters caught between their camps. Because of
that, moral alignment of the characters, as well as their
motivations, is blurred and the film relies on excellent
actors in order to portray their inner dilemmas that might
be as nerve-racking as the external struggle depicted in
this film. Good example is the character of "Jiggs" - an
officer who admires General Scott and shares his position on
nuclear disarmament but stops short of going against
Constitution. Kirk Douglas is excellent in this role,
displaying whole variety of conflicting emotions. Burt
Lancaster, one of the acting giants of the era who used to
be Douglas' partner in many films, is excellent as general
who remains patriotic and brave despite taking part in the
treacherous action. Fredric March is also very good in the
role of weak president forced to find statesmanship
qualities in the worst occasion imaginable, while Edmond
O'Brien provides very effective comic relief as alcoholic
Georgia senator.
Being the product of its time might not be such a good thing
for SEVEN DAYS IN MAY, because modern audience, especially
those who grew up after the end of Cold War, might not
understand the dilemma that used to haunt superpower leaders
in that period - whether to keep the peace by building more
and more bombs and wait for the freak accident starts
unstoppable cycle of mutually assured destruction or to
disarm and stake the survival of the whole nation on the
other side's good faith. This dilemma is well-presented in
this film, allowing both sides to plead their case, and many
people would be tempted to side with General Scott when he
argues that mere peace of paper, whether a treaty or
Constitution, is worthless when it comes to guarding peace
and national security. Such sentiments might be found even
today in the aftermath of WTC bombing - a lot of people are
prepared to sacrifice constitutional liberties for the sake
of security. Unfortunately, when it comes to the resolution
of this dilemma, Rod Serling, screenwriter best known for
his work on TWILIGHT ZONE, uses unconvincing combination of
deus ex machina and pro-Constitution sermon. This weak
ending makes a huge and unpleasant contrast to the otherwise
realistic set-up of the whole film. The unconvincing element
of the film is the subplot involving General Scott's former
mistress, obviously introduced only create role for Ava
Gardner in film where all major characters happen to be men.
Finally, the soundtrack by Jerry Goldsmith is also
disappointing compared with his future triumphs. SEVEN DAYS
IN MAY, despite being within the limits of the time when it
was made, still represents a very good, thought-provoking
film that is more related to our times than we would like.
Copyright © 2002 Dragan Antulov
|