|
All-Reviews.com Movie/Video Review
The Sum Of All Fears
|
  out of 4
 Review by Harvey Karten 3 stars out of 4
|
When I was in college during the late 1950's I often thought,
"Why bother? The world is going to end in a nuclear
catastrophe before I graduate." But after chugging a few beers
at the next fraternity house party and playing yet another game
of touch football, I realized, "Yeah, our number is up, but what
else is there to do? Go to work?" So I finished college and then,
when Kennedy confronted Khrushchev over Cuban missiles, I
said, "Aha, I knew it...my timing was off, that's all." That passed
and now we're in serious danger again. Islamic extremists are
threatening to destroy Western culture, but luckily they won't
have nuclear weapons for at least three years. Whew. But
wait! What if an atomic or hydrogen bomb from the arsenals of
the present nuclear powers got lost somewhere? Couldn't a
madman pick it up and use it to knock out far more people
than would a plane crashing into a building?" Therein lies the
story of "The Sum of All Fears," part of novelist Tom Clancy's
Jack Ryan series ("The Hunt for Red October," "Patriot Games"
and "Clear and Present Danger") dealing with the loss of one
such bomb by an Israeli pilot during the 1973 Mideast war,
discovered 29 years later buried in a garden.
Nuclear proliferation remains the biggest threat to world
security today, but at least we can tell ourselves that the people
in power are rational enough to restrain themselves lest they
bring a terrible retaliation on their own countries. But what if
some third force the type of enemy prevalent in the James
Bond series were to get their hands on a nuke and use it either
to blackmail the great powers or, even worse, to use it in order
to provoke Russia and the U.S. to destroy each other? In "The
Sum of All Fears" this is the specific motive of a small group of
neo-Nazis led by billionaire fascist Dressler (Alan Bates) who
arrange to buy the lost weapon for some $48 million, have it
transported through the Israeli port of Haifa to Baltimore, and
hide it inside a cigarette machine to be used during the Super
Bowl game. In Dressler's all-too-knowing mind, the nuclear
devastation of a bomb about one-fourth as powerful as the one
used on Hiroshima would lead the American President Fowler
(James Cromwell) to assume that this was ordered by Russian
President Nemerov (Ciaran Hinds). An order to retaliate would
lead to a counter-retaliation and before you know it the U.S. and
Russia, both powers hated by these Nazis, would be destroyed.
As Dressler put it, "Hitler was not crazy, but he was stupid to
take on both the United States and Russia." Dressler would
have the Americans and Russians do the dirty deed
themselves.
Is this information a spoiler? For some, yes, but because "The
Sum of All Fears" requires some background in political theory
and history, many in the audience are bound to wonder what the
heck is going on who is Dressler, what does he stand for, why
is he doing this? The film is divided into two parts: in the
opening segment, history Ph.D. Jack Ryan is called in by the
C.I.A. director, William Cabot (Morgan Freeman), because Ryan
had written a paper on the character of the Russian president.
When a political debacle occurs in Nemerov's country, Ryan
must clue the U.S. president into whether Nemerov actually
ordered an attack on Chechnya or whether renegade generals
had taken over the country. In the second part, after the nuclear
devastation in Baltimore, the U.S. and Russia are both ready to
launch nuclear missiles, purportedly to get a first-strike
advantage. Ryan's job is to persuade both sides that the
nuclear explosion was not the fault of either power and to get
the two sides to stand down. Both the Russian and the
American presidents are facing opposing arguments by their top
advisers, who can be divided neatly into hawks and doves, with
Defense Secretary Becker (Philip Baker Hall) taking the side
that America must attack and Secretary of State Owens (Ron
Rifkin) taking the stand-down attitude.
Though the film features a tepid romance between Ryan and
his physician girlfriend Dr. Cathy Muller (Bridget Moynihan), the
love stuff is thankfully kept to a minimum to avoid the goo that
devastated "Pearl Harbor." I'll take the view that the first
segment of the film is the better one: there is more human
drama and Morgan Freeman, easily a superior actor when
compared to Ben Affleck (or at least in a role that suits him
better), has the major role and is terribly underused thereafter..
Director Phil Alden Robinson pumps up Jerry Goldsmith's music
far too much during the most action-centered second segment
and the human drama takes the back door to strictly macho
posturing between the two sides. We do get the message that
the U.S. and Russia and by extension every major power goes
through an unceasing shifting between dovish views and
hawkish responses (think Simon Peres vs. Arik Sharon and Bibi
Netanyahu in Israel and Yassar Arafat's Fatah vs. the more
militant organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the
Palestinian quarters). While there are sufficient scares in the
facedown between the superpowers, much of Paul Attanasio
and Daniel Pyne's script turns into the generic area inhabited by
"Armageddon" and the like and is therefore ultimately less
satisfying then Tom Clancy's novel should have been in this
screen adaptation.
Copyright © 2002 Harvey Karten
|
|
|
|


Buy movie posters!
|