My association with "Star Trek" goes back to the premiere of the
original series. Dad sat back in his easy chair while I sprawled on the
rug, waiting to see if this new show would finally bring "real" sci-fi
to network TV. We were discouraged by the first episode, which revolved
around a shape-shifting salt monster, but we hung in there. Thankfully,
subsequent episodes got better.
Our interest faded in the third (and final) season, which, for the most
part, was awful. Later, however, when daily reruns of the show began, I
got hooked all over again. Over time, I came to enjoy the cheesiness of
some Season Three episodes ("Oh my God, they've stolen Spock's brain!")
In 1975, I even traveled to New York City to attend one of the first
"Star Trek" conventions.
When the film franchise started, I was there on opening day, thrilled to
see the crew back in action despite my disappointment with the movie. I
remained a fan regardless and my reward came in 1986, with the premiere
of "Star Trek: The Next Generation." The sequel series was stiff at
first, and some of the plotlines were rehashes of tales from the
original show, but "ST: TNG" came into its own and became my favorite
show of the franchise (my loyalty has not extended to the post "TNG"
I tell you all this for two reasons. First, it feels good to embrace my
inner geek. Second, knowing my relationship to "Star Trek" will place my
comments about the new film in the proper context.
"Star Trek: Nemesis" starts off wobbly, then finds its footing and moves
forward with considerable force. The movie feels more physical than
previous outings, punching a hole into the complacency exhibited on
occasion by the bridge crew as they sat in their comfy dental chairs
watching big-screen space TV.
Where does the film place in comparison to the other "ST: TNG" outings?
It's better than "Generations" and "Insurrection," but not as good as
"First Contact." I suspect the fan debate over the worth of this one to
be more intense than with the other films.
Here's the set up: (SPOILER ALERT: THE FOLLOWING REVEALS THE BASIC
PLOTLINE, BUT NO SPECIFICS) Times are good. Two crew members have just
tied the knot. The first of the two ceremonies, conducted in the groom's
home state of Alaska on planet Earth, is over and the Starship
Enterprise is in route to the bride's home world for the second.
The "B" storyline begins when Chief Engineer Geordi La Forge (LeVar
Burton) picks up some odd readings from a nearby planet. The source
turns out to be the dismantled body of an android that looks exactly
like Data (Brent Spiner).
The "A" storyline starts with a message from Starfleet. The Romulans,
longtime Federation enemies, have experienced a change in power and the
new leader wants to discuss a peace treaty. Upon arrival, Captain
Jean-Luc Picard (Patrick Stewart) learns that the new Romulan leader
hails from Remus, the sister planet of Romulus, although he looks like a
human being. Shinzon (Tom Hardy) states he wants to make peace, but we
know better – the young man has a dark agenda, one that includes some
nastiness with Captain Picard prior to the conquest of Earth (END
In evaluating "Star Trek: Nemesis," it is important to note that the
screenplay was written by John Logan ("Gladiator"), a hard core fan, and
directed by Stuart Baird ("U.S. Marshals"), not a fan at all. Logan's
screenplay shows his fan sensibility, with "Trek" references galore and
a climax that, depending on your mood, either pays homage to or
completely rips-off another "Trek" film.
The agenda in Baird's direction is simply to create an action-adventure
film that will appeal to non-fans. Accordingly, he takes the ceremony at
the beginning of the film and edits it mercilessly (I wish he had left
more of the ceremony and trimmed some of the redundant stuff in the
middle of the film). Wil Wheaton, who played Wesley Crusher in the TV
series, lobbied hard to get a role in the film and succeeded, only to
have Baird chop out all his lines (he now appears onscreen for only a
second or two). A major change for Dr. Beverly Crusher (Gates McFadden)
went "poof" in the editing process and LaForge, Commander Will Riker
(Jonathan Frakes) and Lt. Commander Worf (Michael Dorn) have virtually
nothing to do. As for Counselor Deanna Troi (Marina Sirtis), her face
time is minimal, but at least she gets to handle something important,
after being relegated to comic relief status following her amusing drunk
scene in "First Contact."
Ron Perlman (the "Beauty and the Beast" TV series) is evocative as a
Remun Viceroy, but the film is ultimately a three character piece, with
Picard and Data sharing the screen with the villainous Shinzon. British
actor Tom Hardy is terrific in the role, coming off like a young Alan
Rickman (if they ever decide to do "Die Hard Jr.," he would be perfect).
As always, Patrick Stewart is excellent and the face-offs between the
two provide much of the film's sense of substance. After Ricardo
Montalban's wrathful Khan, I'd rank Shinzon as neck and neck with Alice
Krige's Borg Queen as best villain of the movie franchise.
Brent Spiner is fine as Data, though I did not enjoy the introduction of
yet another look-a-like android. Although Data makes a great impact on
the outcome of the film, the "B" storyline involving the two androids is
woefully anemic. How nice it would be to have a subplot about Dr.
Crusher or Geordi, instead of another study of the emotional and social
growth of an android.
Thematically, the film is about the nature of identity, predisposition
versus free will and the necessity of accepting change. I saw the movie
with my nephew and it sparked some lively talk. What constitutes a
person? If, at the moment of my death, someone copies my memories and
places them into a cloned body, did I survive? Or is the new person just
a Xerox, walking around with the memories of another? And do we make
our own decisions – do we choose – or does a genetic template dictate
our actions and reactions? One of the great things about "Star Trek" is
that, after 35 years, it still raises interesting ethical and
philosophical questions. "Star Trek: Nemesis" has troubles, but the
positives outweigh the negatives. I'm glad I saw it.
And now I shall take my leave, to enjoy the quiet time before this
review is published and I get swamped with letters from "Trek" fans
either congratulating me on my wisdom or informing me that I am a
Copyright © 2002 Edward Johnson-Ott