All reviews all the time! Home   Movies   Music   Video Games
4 DVDs 49 cents each!  |  Rent Dvds- Free Trial  |  Buy Movie Posters  

 Search Amazon
  
  Browse Movies 

 Browse by Genre 

 Other

All-Reviews.com Movie/Video Review
Gladiator

movie reviewmovie reviewmovie reviewvideo review out of 4

All-Reviews.com Movie Review: Gladiator

Starring: Russell Crowe, Joaquin Phoenix
Director: Ridley Scott
Rated: R
RunTime: 154 Minutes
Release Date: May 2000
Genres: Action, Drama


*Also starring: Djimon Hounsou, Derek Jacobi, Ralph Moeller, Connie Nielsen, Spencer Treat Clark, Richard Harris, Tomas Arana, Oliver Reed



Review by Walter Frith
3½ stars out of 4

Ridley Scott is one of those directors that makes good quality films but yet has no stamp of his own. Watching 'Alien', 'Blade Runner', 'Black Rain', 'Thelma and Louise' and 'G.I. Jane' would give you no hint that it's the same guy. Even though most directors have that look or feel that ignite their names in the minds of audiences through camera angles or injections of sub plot, I have never felt that way about Scott but I do admire his films greatly. 'Gladiator' is a broad, sweeping epic film that pays tribute to Shakespeare in its tone, 'Ben-Hur' in its combat scenes and 'Spartacus' in its heroics. What makes the film work is that these influences are not obvious. The film is skillfully presented in such a way as to give the viewer a fresh perspective of the Hollywood epic without ripping off those that came before it.

One thing that has to be mentioned right off the bat is the performance of Russell Crowe. This guy is one of the next generation, an actor of downright diversity and intensity who thrives at not being stereotyped. From an unorthodox cop in early 1950's Los Angeles in 1997's 'L.A. Confidential' to a whistle blowing, conscience stricken tobacco executive in 'The Insider' to a vengeful Roman army soldier, Crowe, along with the likes of Kevin Spacey, Edward Norton and Tom Hanks, will takes over for Pacino, Hackman, Hoffman, De Niro and Nicholson when they retire from films.

In 'Gladiator' Crowe plays General Maximus, a loyal and seemingly unstoppable combat soldier in the Roman empire's army some 2000 years ago who builds a family like relationship with the Caesar of the times named Marcus Aurelius (Richard Harris). The bond between these two men is similar to the bond between a father and son but evil would soon lurk its ugly head between the passage of this great bond. After winning a major battle, Marcus Aurelius secretly tells Maximus that he will name him as successor to the throne of Rome and this does not go over with Marcus Aurelius' son Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix). Before news of the succession can get out, Commodus murders his father and banishes General Maximus to slavery and kills his entire family. Like 'Ben-Hur', Maximus thrives on his banishment and has one goal: survival.....so he can have his vengeance later. Connie Nielsen plays Commodus' sister who was once Maximus' flame and is sort of caught in a catch-22 in all of the treachery that plays out and Derek Jacobi is casted well as a Roman senator.

In the slave world Maximus is purchased by Proximo (Oliver Reed) and this man makes his living training gladiators and finds a hot property with Maximus who is victorious at every turn and even defeats well established legends in the minds of the spectators and quickly becomes a new hero to them. There are greats scenes of sword play, brutal hand to hand combat and confrontations with such fierce creatures as tigers. The cinematography by John Mathieson is breath taking and his work is an early contender for an Oscar.

One thing I didn't like about this film is the fact that Ridley Scott, in filming his action sequences, plays with too many close up shots where the action scurries around in a whirlwind of dust, smoke and fast moves so much so that we cannot focus entirely on the action at hand and the editing process throughout all of this is somewhat rushed and comes off as aloof at several points.

One thing that makes 'Gladiator' work well on many levels is the advent of computer technology. There are many crowd scenes and architectural landscapes that were obviously generated by computers because if the cost of so many extras were put forward along with the cost of building and erecting many Roman like city structures for the given era, the film would have cost about the same as it did to make 'Titanic'.....a cool 200 million dollars. Compared with that film, 'Gladiator' came in at a much lower 103 million dollars because things were not built to scale the way they were in 'Titanic' where James Cameron had a relic of the famous boat built 90% to scale. I remember someone from the cast of 'Ben-Hur' saying that if a film like 'Ben-Hur' were made in this day and age it would probably cost 200 or even 300 million dollars to produce. 'Gladiator' has now been made in a time where computer effects look authentic and not cheesy and combined with many other scenes, I defy anyone to tell the difference between the fake stuff and the reality in every single detail of the film's labour.

Through the eyes of death, the struggle between good and evil and the resolution of the film's climax, 'Gladiator' pays tribute to the most high end of Shakespearean art and will leave the audience finding a whole new perspective on a genre of film some thought might be buried indefinitely. Thank goodness it's not.

Copyright 2000 Walter Frith

More reviews:
Main  2   3   4   5   6   7  8   Next >>
Featured DVD/Video
Star Wars Episode II
buy dvd
($17.99)

buy video
($15.99)

read the reviews

In Affiliation with AllPosters.com
Buy movie posters!


Home | Movies | Music | Video Games | Songs
Amazon.com | AllPosters.com | Half.com | Columbia House | Netflix

Copyright 1998-2002 All-Reviews.com
Privacy Policy |  Advertising Info |  Contact Us